A listen to the Scrum Guide update video with Ken Schwaber, Jeff Sutherland, and David West makes a case that I did not know some things. Though I am not-quite-ready to say that “I know nothing”, I acknowledge the danger across Scrum that pulls good people and good intention into a game of thrones.
When I ponder Agile transformation all around me, I found Scrum has a clear point to revisit: the Scrum Master role. The Scrum Master role is an unfortunate political challenge to adopters and court jesters alike who question what is a Scrum Master master of? Likely, the thinking is that a Scrum Master knows nothing.
The Scrum Master is a servant-leader for the Scrum Team. The Scrum Master helps those outside the Scrum Team understand which of their interactions with the Scrum Team are helpful and which aren’t. The Scrum Master helps everyone change these interactions to maximize the value created by the Scrum Team. Scrum Guide
Books of legend tell of a time where kingdoms, fiefdoms, serfs, and vassals chose a Scrum Master from project manager rank. In those dark ages the general belief was that the project manager skills were a wonderful role to refactor or repurpose. As a recovering project manager, I found the project manager had became more like an accountant than a human capital coach.
The role is to give the development team as much autonomy as possible from the rest of the organization holding them back or adding gauntlets.
Scrum Master is someone who is skilled at helping someone turn visions, if possible, into something of value. And if not … find out what needs to be changed or how it could be done differently.
The Scrum Master is a master of:
The Scrum Master is not a part-time role for someone to do in their free time. The Scrum Master, dual-hat, role is a deeply flawed, but oft-implemented strategy in many organizations.
How do I see this abuse? How do I see this abuse? As Schwaber says, “Scrum fails at the people level.”
I see people suffer public flogging when a development team member manacled to develop code as well as wear the Scrum Master chain: #fail.
I see a road littered with the fallen as management indenture quality assurance roles are accountable to test first and Scrum later: #fail.
I feel the case for transformation is embedded within the Scrum Master role, itself. While the Product Owner is critical for the workflow and strategic success, the Scrum Master lays the mortar that strengthens against siege, from the 2017 Scrum Guide update video:
Scrum Master or Scrum Maester
If not code or quality then what is a master, master of?
The Scrum Master is responsible to promote and support Scrum as defined in the Scrum Guide. Scrum Masters promote and support Scrum when they help everyone understand Scrum:
- Rules, and
source: Scrum Guide
But master? Why does this happen? Too often the enterprise fails to account for the knowledge, skill, and ability required to navigate and articulate change.
Perhaps Scrum Maester frame reveals the deeper skill for Scrum Master success:
- Emotional Intelligence
- Social Awareness
- Relationship Management
- Self Awareness
- Self Management
The work is with the people that make things and the Scrum Master helps enable those people to make what their skills and capability can. The Scrum Master is a singularly difficult role.
- Trust, and
Working with people is the only way to make this happen. There is no team focus without focus on team success.
It’s a very, very tough job. Their main skill is the ability to bind people together and help them work together when things don’t work and when do work to celebrate, but it’s not a simple job at all. The mastery is in those three areas [empiricism, self-organizing teams, and Lean thinking]” Ken Schwaber
And our Masters are Maesters:
Maesters … are an order of scholars, healers, and learned men in the Seven Kingdoms. Due to their scientific and intellectual pursuits, they are sometimes referred to as “the knights of the mind”.
Focusing on scientific knowledge and disdaining belief in magic, in the present day the Order of Maesters has largely eclipsed the older Alchemists’ Guild, which claims to possess arcane magical knowledge, but whose number, power, and abilities have waned over the centuries. source: Game of Thrones wiki
Where Scrum fails is at organizations that eschew the cultural possibility. The failure is with those unwilling:
- to delegate,
- to accept accountability
Help them as much as you can, but it is really going to test your patience because you are changing their way of thinking and people do not change readily. Help as much as you can. Ken Schwaber
This is not top down, but team around.
… as possible within the culture of the organization and within the Scrum Master’s organizational political skills and patience. Ken Schwaber
Winter is coming.
But Spring follows.
Although I need more time to absorb and adopt refreshed concepts, I found great insight from their shared experience with Scrum practice as well as the interplay that the three offer to advise Scrum principle alignment.
Sutherland references a paper called: Shock Therapy A Bootstrap for Hyper-Productive Scrum and I want kept this to rumination with you, outside of the Agile CoE or our larger team. Here is a link to the post Sutherland has for the paper called Scrum “Shock Therapy” How to Change Teams FAST.
Share this Post