Below you'll find a list of all posts that have been tagged as “process”
New conditions demand new business management strategy. Technology enabled a disruption greater than any department or team level at a company can solve.
Customers severed the business message and took control of marketing channels.
Media lost privilege, marketers lost their minds, business lost their playbook, and customer’s rewrote the rules of engagement.
We need to reengineer marketing from the outside in and then align people, process, and technology from the inside out.
Change management goes beyond features and functions. Feature and function change management is product change management.
Change management goes beyond scope or requirements. Scope and requirement change management is project change management.
The change that change management needs is an account for how process and technology change the way people meet their objectives.
When I hear capability model I think competence, competence naturally leads me to motivation. So, capability model, to me, represents a human capital knowledge, ability, and skills framework.
Enterprise, systems, or business architects, view capability models as what a company needs to do to execute strategy.
Any link is a system link and strategy is only as good as the ability to execute. Within the pages of The Capable Company: Building the capabilities that make strategy work, I intend to find capability model methods that identify business and technical details needed for strategic links to execute those capabilities.
In the beginning was change. Well, the beginning, itself, was change. From the beginning, however, change challenged. Some wanted change, some …
A look at what other’s have done to achieve success certainly offers a chance to avoid the aches and scrapes when …
Fast Start conversation: Policies, procedures, forms, transactions, compliance and administrative oversight. Sound like your human resources (HR) department? Many of those …
In business we constantly design. By design I include that we design meetings, we design strategy, we design communication, we design training, and we design projects and programs.
Some design efforts, such as strategy, business process re-engineering, or talent engagement initiatives, may result in new processes, new standards, or new tasks, but the design goal remains: adoption and utility.
A project introduces something new. New requires change from what was to a promise of what will. The project deliverable, or …
People, process, and technology is not a law, it is a rule of thumb; we could quibble that people should not need it’s own category, as both process and technology rely on people. However, it is clear in most change that people draw the short straw in design.
I propose we include behavior into functional design.
Policy, procedure, and bureaucracy tend to creep as an organization grows in size: revenues, market share, employees. With that creep does organization …
Three things I’ve seen, read, or thought might seed results: 1. Learning Fosters Psychologically Healthy Workplaces — CLO Magazine The American Psychological Association …
Project management offers a way to breathe new life into your organization’s competitive and operational advantage, but why is project management seemingly …
Technology enables information access and facilitates information sharing. But why do so many information technology projects fail? The information part of Information Technology …
I find people have a tendency to become too involved too quickly with tactics. Tactics include what to buy, what to build, what to move. Strategy is why build, why buy, why move.
Much of your organization is involved in the detail of execution, it is illogical they are not strategically aligned. When your team discovers tactics they deliver align to organization goals there is clear purpose in what they do.
Purpose provides motivation.
The meat of the strategic planning process is the goals-objectives-actions value chain. People may have other definitions for goals, objectives, and actions, and bristle at the rigidity of the definitions, however, a single use for each term will remove interpretation and confusion.